Painkiller drugs. Online pharmacy.
 
 
CATEGORIES
 
PHARMACY NEWS
 
 

Online pharmacy of generic drugs for pain relief

 
The main group of painkillers are different in chemical structure and mechanism of action of medicinal substances. Among the main drugs of pain are analgesics. Distinguish non-narcotic and narcotic analgesics. For non-narcotic analgesics include various synthetic drugs (analginum, acetylsalicylic acid, butadion, paracetamol, etc.). Compared with the narcotic analgesics, they have less assuager activity and are effective mainly for pain arising from inflammatory lesions in various organs and tissues.
 

Specialty Drug Costs Push Part D Enrollees Through Doughnut Hole


01.03.2010

BETHESDA, MD 02 March 2010—A recently released report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) states that most Medicare Part D enrollees who use high-cost, specialty-tier-eligible drugs spend enough to become eligible for catastrophic coverage during the plan year.

The GAO report (PDF) was commissioned by Representative Pete Stark of California, who released a statement expressing concern that seniors` out-of-pocket costs for specialty drugs are escalating rapidly.

According to GAO, 55% of Part D enrollees in 2007 who took at least one drug whose monthly costs exceeded $500 eventually spent enough on prescription drugs to become eligible for catastrophic coverage. In contrast, 5% of Part D enrollees who did not use a specialty-tier-eligible drug incurred costs that triggered catastrophic coverage.

Part D enrollees qualify for catastrophic coverage after reaching their initial benefit limit and then spending through that year`s coverage gap, also known as the doughnut hole. For 2010, enrollees in a standard Part D plan would incur $2830 in medication costs, including $708 in out-of-pocket costs, to reach the initial coverage limit and enter the doughnut hole.

At that point, the enrollee is responsible for all medication costs up to the annual out-of-pocket maximum of $4550; catastrophic coverage then assumes 95% of drug costs, with the enrollee paying 5%.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) allows Part D plan sponsors to develop utilization controls for high-cost drugs, including assigning them to specialty tiers that have higher copayments than less-expensive drugs.

GAO examined whether the use of specialty tiers affects Part D enrollees` out-of pocket expenses for high-cost drugs. According to the report, Part D plan designs with different copayments or coinsurance requirements for specialty drugs had little effect on enrollees` costs for the products once beneficiaries reached their out-of-pocket maximum and used their catastrophic coverage.

The report explains that Part D enrollees would become eligible for catastrophic coverage after about six months of taking a drug that costs $1100 per month, regardless of whether a plan implemented a $50 copayment, 25% coinsurance, or 33% coinsurance requirement for the drug.

GAO also found that the vast majority of spending on specialty-tier-eligible drugs occurs on behalf of low-income beneficiaries whose Part D coverage is heavily subsidized by the federal government.

According to the report, about 70% of all spending on specialty-tier-eligible drugs was made on behalf of the poorest Medicare beneficiaries. This spending totaled about $4.0 billion of the $5.6 billion spent on specialty-tier-eligible drugs in 2007, GAO stated.

In all, 67% of these low-income specialty-drug users qualified for catastrophic coverage, compared with 31% of other Part D enrollees, according to the report.

For its analysis, GAO examined drug costs and cost-sharing requirements for 20 drugs, including the 10 highest-use specialty drugs for 2007, by 11 Part D plans. GAO also examined changes in the costs of these specialty drugs in 2008 and 2009.

GAO found that manufacturers did not negotiate discounts to Part D plan sponsors for certain specialty drugs, such as the cancer chemotherapy agents erlotinib and imitinib mesylate.

According to the report, Part D plans stated that their average annual per-patient price for imitinib mesylate rose from roughly $31,000 to about $45,500 between 2006 and 2009, an increase of 46%.

The report notes that such changes can affect enrollees` out-of-pocket costs, even when they receive catastrophic coverage, as well as Medicare`s overall costs.

The report stated that Part D plan sponsors reported little leverage to negotiate with manufacturers of specialty drugs, in part because of a lack of alternative products.

On average, the cost of specialty drugs increased by 36% from 2006 to 2009, according to GAO.

 

← Step Back     Home ↑